Tag Archives: Slip and Falls injury

How To Prevent Serious Slip And Fall Accidents, Accident Precautions

If you have been hurt in a Slip And Fall caused by an environmental defect or hazard, you should seek assistance from an experienced Philadelphia slip and fall lawyer.

“Slip and Fall” cases are part of a larger category of tort cases that are commonly referred to as “premises liability” cases. Premises liability cases are cases in which liability is based on the failure of a property owner or occupier to exercise an appropriate degree of care toward people entering onto their property, and that failure results in injury. Like other types of injuries, slips and falls can result in serious, potentially permanent injuries that can throw a person’s life into chaos.

An attorney who understands this area of law, and has experience in handling these cases will know how to investigate your incident and explore all legal options that may be available to you.

To receive a free and confidential review of the facts in your case, contact The Philadelphia Law Firm We have many years of experience with helping slip and fall victims in Philadelphia. We would be glad to review your case in a free and confidential consultation.

The Elements of a Slip and Fall Claim in Philadelphia

To establish a viable slip and fall claim under Philadelphia law, the evidence must satisfy three elements:

  • The owner or occupier of the premises either knew or in the exercise of ordinary care reasonably should have known of the hazard which caused the fall;
  • The individual who suffered the injury had inferior knowledge of the hazard relative to the owner/occupier, despite exercising of ordinary care for his or her own safety; and
  • The injured party’s inferior knowledge of the hazard was due to actions or conditions that were within the owner/operator’s control.

Classification of Entrants: Important Issue in Slip and Fall Cases

The duties that an owner/occupier of property owes to another person entering onto his or her land it determined by reference to the relationship between the owner/occupier and the entrant. In Philadelphia, entrants to the property of another fall within at least one of three distinct categories:

  • Invitees – Invitees are individuals who have received an express or implied invitation to come onto the premises for a business purpose that would render his presence on the property of mutual aid or benefit to both parties. A customer in a store, for instance, would be an invitee, or a sales representative for one of the store’s suppliers. A property owner or occupier owes the highest duty of care to invitees – the owner must exercise ordinary care to keep the premises and approaches safe for the invitee.
  • Licensees – Licensees are individuals who are permitted to come onto the premises of another, but are present solely for his or her own interests or convenience. Examples of licensees are social guests, individuals conducting door-to-door surveys, or an individual who enters into an establishment solely to use the restroom, with no intention of making a purchase. Owners owe a duty not to expose licensees knowingly to an unreasonable risk of harm, and are liable for willful or wanton injuries to licensees.
  • Trespassers – Trespassers are unauthorized entrants onto the premises of an owner or occupier. The owner only owes a duty to avoid wantonly and willfully harming the trespasser. (Please see our discussion of the special considerations that apply to child trespassers.)

An invitee can become a licensee if he or she goes beyond the scope of an invitation. For instance, if a customer enters an area of the store that has been marked for “employees only,” the customer would no longer be treated under Philadelphia law as an invitee. However, if the owner knows of a licensee’s actual presence, then the duty owed to the licensee is the same as the duty owed to an invitee.

Hazardous Conditions Can Lead to Slip and Falls in Philadelphia

Another key issue in slip and fall cases is the owner’s and the entrant’s relative knowledge of the hazardous condition that caused the fall.

Under Philadelphia law, the owner or occupier of property can be liable to invitees who suffer injuries due to the owner’s failure to guard against or warn of any hazardous conditions on the property that the owner knows of, or in the exercise of ordinary care reasonably should have known of at the time the fall occurred.

However, the owner must have had superior knowledge of the hazardous condition relative to the entrant. Where both the owner and the entrant have equal knowledge of the hazardous condition, the owner cannot be liable for any harm the entrant suffers – owners/occupiers are not insurers of the entrant’s safety.

Hazardous conditions can be divided into two categories:

1. Static conditions – These are patent, longstanding conditions that exist on the premises. Examples include:

  • Uneven pavement
  • Holes in the sidewalk
  • Poorly lit stairs.

For a property owner or occupier to be liable for an injury caused by a static condition, the evidence must show that the owner had superior knowledge of the condition’s existence and of the danger presented by that condition

If the owner’s knowledge of the hazard which caused the injury is superior – relative to the invitee – then the owner has a duty to take reasonable steps to warn the entrant about the hazard so that the entrant can take appropriate steps to avoid it.

Owners/occupiers have no duty to warn of unexpected, unforeseeable or open and obvious dangers

2. Foreign substances or finishes – Examples of foreign substances or finishes include:

  • Debris
  • Water
  • Ice
  • Spilled liquids
  • Other objects.

Another example is a dangerously slippery condition caused by recent waxing or oiling of the floor.

For property owners or occupiers to be liable for a slip and fall caused by a foreign substance or finish, the evidence must show that the owner had superior knowledge of the existence of the condition which caused the fall and the danger presented by that condition.

Owners and occupiers may also be liable if the evidence shows that they lacked knowledge of the hazard because they failed to exercise reasonable care in inspecting or maintaining the premises.

Assessment of these issues requires a thorough review of the circumstances and facts in each particular case by an experienced attorney.

What Does ‘Ordinary Care for Your Own Safety’ Mean in Slip and Fall Cases?

The fact that a hazardous condition exists on a premises does not mean that anyone who is injured when they encounter that hazard can automatically recover from the owner or occupier.

Under Philadelphia law, individuals must generally exercise ordinary care for their own safety, employing all of their senses to discover and avoid conditions that may pose a risk of injury.

When an invitee knows of a hazard but takes no steps to avoid it, he or she is voluntarily exposing himself or herself to the risk of injury posed by the hazard. Under these circumstances, the injured party will be deemed to have assumed the risk of injury, and cannot hold the owner or occupier liable for any resulting injuries.

  • There are limited exceptions to this duty that arise in the following scenarios:
  • Emergencies
  • Situations causing stress or excitement
  • Situations where the invitee’s attention has been diverted – either of necessity or by the owner or occupier.

How Does Causation Play a Role in a Slip and Fall Injury?

As in any injury claim based on negligence, injured parties in slip and fall cases can recover for injuries only upon proof that those injuries were caused by the negligence of the owner or occupier.

In some situations, an owner or occupier may argue that a plaintiff suffered from a condition before a slip and fall occurred. For instance, the owner may contend that the plaintiff already had a slipped or bulging disc, and the slip and fall did not cause this injury.

It is important to note that a valid claim may be made when a slip and fall causes a pre-existing condition to be aggravated or made worse.

A lawyer with experience in handling personal injury claims can review one’s medical records and consult with experts to determine the extent of harm caused by the slip and fall.

Contact Us Today for Help with Your Philadelphia Slip and Fall Case

At The Philadelphia Law Firm, our trial attorneys offer trusted, proven representation for people who have been seriously hurt because of a property owner’s carelessness.

Our clients receive dedicated and individual attention from our well experienced and passionate Philadelphia trial lawyers who are driven to get results for slip and fall victims and their families.